Bryce Nakashima vs Aidan Kim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nakashima vs A. Kim

Bryce Nakashima
USA
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
20
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
595
0
Best Rank
546
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Aidan Kim
USA
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
20
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
595
0
Best Rank
546
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Kim
They have played 3 sets in total, with Bryce Nakashima winning 2 and Aidan Kim winning 1. The last match between Bryce Nakashima and Aidan Kim was at the M15 Naples, 28-02-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Bryce Nakashima getting the victory 6-7(9) 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nakashima | 1 |
| Kim | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Naples(02-28-23)
Bryce Nakashima
6
6
6
Aidan Kim
7
2
3
B. Nakashima vs A. Kim H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.28% (40-38) | Career Total W/L | 58.77% (67-47) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Nakashima vs A. Kim Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bryce Nakashima has won 44.57% of points on their second serve, while Aidan Kim has won 44.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bryce Nakashima, in recent form, has won 49.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aidan Kim has won 46.70%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.74% and 25.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bryce Nakashima has saved 56.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aidan Kim has saved 53.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bryce Nakashima has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 3/4), with Aidan Kim winning 62.96% (W/L 17/10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bryce Nakashima has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/9). Aidan Kim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 37/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bryce Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 2/3), where as Aidan Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.00% of matches (W/L 14/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bryce Nakashima winning 1 times and Aidan Kim being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bryce Nakashima winning 2 and Aidan Kim winning 1.
- The last match between Bryce Nakashima and Aidan Kim was at the M15 Naples, 28-02-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Bryce Nakashima getting the victory 6-7(9) 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:38:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bryce Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 627.86 while Aidan Kim has played against players with an average rank of 470.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bryce Nakashima has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aidan Kim has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bryce Nakashima has converted 41.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aidan Kim has converted 36.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Bryce Nakashima vs Aidan Kim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Nakashima vs A. Kim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 12 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:38:0 | Average Match Time | 2:38:0 |
| 58% (58/100) | 1st Serve % | 64% (63/98) |
| 76% (44/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (46/63) |
| 69% (29/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (14/35) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 39% (38/98) | Return Points Win % | 27% (27/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Nakashima 47%, Kim 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Nakashima 53%, Kim 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Nakashima 63%, Kim 61%.
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(3) 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(2) | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
A. Kim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||

B. Nakashima vs A. Kim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.28% (40/38) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.77% (67/47) |
| 51.45% (89/84) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.21% (156/112) |
| 52.20% (888/813) | Games Win/Loss | 52.64% (1348/1213) |
| 51.79% (29/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.71% (37/22) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 47.06% (8/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.17% (13/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 156 | Aces Total | 490 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 109 | Total Double Faults | 285 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:35:15 |
| 379.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.07 |
| 58% (1543/2641) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4440/7090) |
| 69% (1060/1543) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3031/4440) |
| 48% (529/1098) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1326/2650) |
| 42% (80/191) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (310/725) |
| 36% (905/2486) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2847/7016) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Challenger W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 52.70% (39/35) | Futures W/L | 62.14% (64/39) |
| 51% (40/78) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (67/112) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 41% (9/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (18/28) |
| 47% (8/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (19/38) |
| 92% (38/35) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (67/58) |
| 8% (38/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (67/9) |
| 13% (40/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (47/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction09:05 PM 14/11/25
Prediction01:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction12:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
18:39
H2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico